Missing in Action: The Lost Boys of the Sexual Revolution

Here’s the deal: recently, while browsing through an article at HUS I read several comments by Mike who was writing about his traumatic experiences in adolescence vis a vis women. I was angered by the general lack of empathy shown by the (mostly) female audience there. I consequently wrote a somewhat snarky comment about this abysmal state of affairs and also voiced my compassion with Mike. Her majesty (H.M.S.) Susan Walsh responded by promptly deleting my comment because of its “counterproductive, critical tone”.

Of course, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. After all the female-solipsistic imperative remains strong and vigorous even in supposedly male-friendly websites like HUS. So. Only female suffering is relevant. Only female matters matter. And men, in turn, matter only insofar as they are of use to women. Mrs Walsh can deny it all she wants but I – just like many others in the ‘manosphere’ – have become sceptical of her agenda and goal. Thus, I see my blog as a respite for men, a place where their grievances and concerns can be adressed, analyzed and discussed…in the hopes of finding remedies. Enough said. I dedicate the following article to Mike and wish him godspeed and the best of luck in his life.

Of the great many miseries and suffering Feminism has brought the West nothing, imo, can compare to the systematic psychological neutering of men and demonisation of masculinity itself. Not just because of the cruel, fascistic inhumanity of fiddling with and ‘engineering’ an entire sex but, more importantly, because of its diastrous consequences. Whereas since time immemorial men had had a clearcut set of ethics, behaviors and morals they could follow, they now had nothing, no compass, no direction. Their consciousness brainwashed and literally blankslated by massive educational and societal conditioning, they opted for the (seemingly) logical thing and desperately attempted to conform to Feminism’s comandments of “equality“, “respecting women” “male” “touchy-feely empathy, domestication “pacifism/passivism“…and all the other hogwash. In short…the Nice Guy was born. No strike that. The Nice Guy was systematically engineered, molded and crushed into being by Feminism.

Imagine: entire generations of men in the West wholly emasculated, being taught in school, family and general society to reject their own sex, to loathe their own self…because it is wrong to be male. Aggressiveness and competitiveness was whipped out of them while being obsequious, smarmy and uncritical was deemed correct behavior. With carrots and sticks Pawlovian, feminist gender stalinists thus wilfully dealt out critical blows to men’s self esteem and sense of identity. Man was passé. In the ‘New Girl Order‘ men were verboten and only drones allowed. And any boy who was too masculine needed a hefty dose of Ritalin to get this harmful, patriarchal maleness out of his system. In the West, boyhood was a raw deal from the getgo. But far, far worse was adolescense.

Gentle, dreamy eyed puppies grew into troubled nice guy romantics. They had ingested so much shmaltzy “equality” B.S. it was oozing right out of their ears. Gender was just a social construct, after all. There were no differences between the sexes. If we just respect and love each other everything will be right. Kumbajah, right? Yeah sure. Only a slight problem: things didn’t seem to work out with the girls, at all. Treating girls with respect, giving them all the adoration and pedestalization Feminists had claimed they wanted was getting them nowhere. Time and again nice guys were abused as emotional tampons, as shoulders to cry on and then carelessly discarded with a flippant ‘let’s just be friends‘. These same girls would then later on hop right back on the cock carousel and hook up with cavemen douchebags, total jerks…the *exact* aggressive, patriarchal males Feminists were always bleating about as being, bad, baaaaaad, baaaaaaaaaad.

So what did these nice guys do? What could they do? For the most part, they soldiered on grimly, tried to convince themselves that everything was fine, that ‘true love‘ was just one step away, beyond the horizon, sure to come, just have faith. They fought on for years. The kept dreaming, fantasizing, making the same mistakes. They kept doubling down and executing their (feminist) programming only to get the same results and, increasingly, *does not compute* bluescreens in their heads. With every year and every experience…came fresh emotional wounds, fresh traumata, new horrors, selfdoubt, nightmares.

At this stage, many men had become lonely, depressed, embittered, cynical, confused, angry, desperate, melancholic etc. Some killed themselves. Some unfortunate men married used up, aged sluts that wanted to “settle down” only to be divorce-raped a few years later. Losing everything, getting evicted from their house and children and forced into modern slavery, they got shafted yet again, adding fresh injury to already terrible wounds. Some few tried to talk about their problems with their peers – only to be laughed at, ridiculed, told to ‘man up’, NAWALT or other utter tosh. So they shut up and phased out. Ghosted. Gradually lost themselves in action and drifted away from a cold society that didn’t care and didn’t listen.

So fast forward to 2012: having spent the flower of their youth in emotional concentration camps in deep freeze, having been systematically lied to about the single most important aspect of their lives (sexuality) these poor men are the walking wounded of our present day and age. Similar to Vietnam-Vets these ‘Lost Boys‘ are shellshocked, emotional cripples with the ‘Thousand Yards Stare of Love‘. By and large ignored and ridiculed by society…they are quietly crawling away from agony, to a better place, where they may yet find justice. These are ‘men going their own way‘ and I for one salute them with the utmost respect.

For in the merciless ‘Gender War‘ the first victim, literally, was innocence.

Advertisements

20 comments on “Missing in Action: The Lost Boys of the Sexual Revolution

  1. MuffManMike says:

    Excellent post sir. It certainly paints an exact picture of the mid 80’s to early 90’s i grew up in.

    I will reply more in depth with thoughts later on tonight when i’m home from work, but i’ll leave with this:

    Don’t be too hard on the women of HUS. Susan means well and her mission isn’t a bad one (although biased and still not correcting the elephant in the room, marriage 2.0) as it educates women on the reality of ‘do as i say not as i do’. And the majority of the women have been understanding and supportive. We can’t expect them to fully understand what drought and incel means for a guy, any more than we can understand how the female brain interprets things (in an irrational twilight zone way sometimes). But it’s not that they (women of HUS) don’t care, so i don’t want people getting the idea that they don’t. The ladies at HUS are way beyond your average run of the mill Jane Doe walking down the street with her pet husband leering at the guy on the motorcycle not understanding why her panties are getting moist. That being said, I’m starting to get the feeling that most of the women at HUS (herd mentality) are starting to believe that they are they rule, rather than the exception.

    They’re not. They are the exception. And that’s why they’re so special. If every woman had the ability to reflect, think, process and correct like Olive, the fires of Rome would be snuffed out relatively quickly. Sadly there are new lost boys created every single day perfectly content to watch Rome reduced to ashes, myself included. When one half of society has spoken that you are not required, replaceable, are a beast of burden, all the onus is on you to impress upon and win their hearts (with nothing coming back), and with hamsters run amok, to what do i owe this society in return but my scorn, apathy and indifference. Let me pull up a lawn-chair and a beer and watch the embers dance from the funeral pyre that is our civilization.

    Peace.

    • umslopogaas says:

      @MuffManMike:

      Many thanks.

      Don’t be too hard on the women of HUS. Susan means well and her mission isn’t a bad one (although biased and still not correcting the elephant in the room, marriage 2.0)…

      Yes, I agree with you. She certainly is far better than your average garden variety feminist or the western mainstream of screeching harpies. However, she’s nonetheles,imo, still batting for ‘Team Woman’. The Female Imperative is strong. And this is what saddens me. And also what I perceive as a general lack of empathy for men at HUS.

      You see it’s not that I am so bitter and angry that I cannot comprehend the possibility of good women. I want to believe they are out there. Yet thus far I have mostly been dissapointed (in the West). Grerp, Suz and some others being the exception.

      They’re not. They are the exception. And that’s why they’re so special. If every woman had the ability to reflect, think, process and correct like Olive, the fires of Rome would be snuffed out relatively quickly. Sadly there are new lost boys created every single day perfectly content to watch Rome reduced to ashes, myself included. When one half of society has spoken that you are not required, replaceable, are a beast of burden, all the onus is on you to impress upon and win their hearts (with nothing coming back), and with hamsters run amok, to what do i owe this society in return but my scorn, apathy and indifference. Let me pull up a lawn-chair and a beer and watch the embers dance from the funeral pyre that is our civilization.”

      Again agreed, wholeheartedly. In essence the ball is in the women’s court. *They* need to collectively haul ass and help us reform and change Western society. And their time is limited. Imo, societal trends have massive inertia. It takes quite a lot of time and energy to get them moving…but once moving they are difficult to slow down. So. If and when a critical mass of ‘Lost Boys’ elects to ghost and GTOW it will all fall apart. I’d say this point is perhaps…10-20 years away.

      If they fail I will grab a lawn-chair and a beer of my own and join you on the sidelines, brother. Heh, we can even invite Emperor Nero for the grand finale. He would sure appreciate the ‘big bang’ final disolution of feminist fempocalypse.

      • imnobody says:

        Yes, there are good women (I have been witness of that) but Susan is not one of them. Susan belongs to Team Woman (she has acknowledge this in her blog). Susan’s aim is to advance woman’s interest. This is why men’s grievances couldn’t interest her less. Mike is not an isolate case. There have been lots of them.

        The only thing that distinguishes Susan from feminists is the means. The ends are the same: the fulfillment of female needs and wants without giving a damn about men’s needs and wants. Men’s need are only considered when this consideration is unavoidable to get women’s needs and wants.

        Susan (who has praised the effects of feminism on her life once and again) figured out that the feminist strategy is no longer valid and some change of tactics is necessary. But she is not our ally: it is only a different brand of evil.

        Umslopogaas: Cudos to you, sir. You’ve completely nailed the issue. And thanks for dropping by.

  2. imnobody says:

    As a one of the millions of Lost Boys of the Sexual Revolution, I couldn’t agree more.

  3. Ray Manta says:

    imnobody wrote:
    Yes, there are good women (I have been witness of that) but Susan is not one of them. Susan belongs to Team Woman (she has acknowledge this in her blog).

    That’s right. If there are any doubts about that, Dalrock’s post about her should remove them.

    As to women changing societal trends, I don’t see them doing anything unless they have no other choice. When the Misandry Bubble pops, the costs of misandry will be transferred directly to women. There won’t be any man-financed buffer to protect them. That’s when real change will occur.

    • umslopogaas says:

      Nothing but the truth, brother.

      We are looong since past the point of no return. Mrs. Walsh is just trying to repaint gynocentrism and create a new system of male (provider) exploitation as status objects. She wants Feminism II camoouflaged as Patriarchy II.

      It’s like Tyler Durden says:

      …only after disaster can we be resurrected. Only after we’ve lost everything are we free to do anything“.

      Come to think of it…’Fight Club’ was MGTOW before there even was the term of MGTOW. It’s also an early & unconscious expression of male resistance to ‘the system’ and their gender roles.

  4. P Ray says:

    Women don’t give good advice to men about women/dating for 3 reasons:
    1. They don’t know,
    2. They know but are embarrassed to say it,
    3. They know and they know how effectively certain behaviours work on certain types of women, which means the guy has a shot at being in a relationship, thus depriving her of the chance to use the guy.
    To draw a horror movie analogy, most women prefer most men be clueless, so that any woman can get a favour off most men, rather than one woman alone receiving things from a man (or having to be beholden to him: it’s a lot harder for a (useful but not-attractive-to them)) man to receive reciprocation from many women that he has done favours for — all will back each other up and call him a creep and perform relational aggression, than it is for one woman to hold back on a guy that she has to depend on.
    It’s the attitude of the locust vs. the facehugger.

    And everytime a man uses his effort, emotion, expertise, money and time to win over an undecided woman …
    a woman is getting the option to use a guy without penalty for not reciprocating.
    A man is wasting his time on a woman planning to use him.
    Remember: time spent with a woman who does not care for you, is time wasted from one who DOES, or pursuing your own interests.
    Dating is simply an easy way for most women to get a free ride through life from most men.
    If love at first sight exists, why do you need to date?
    And if a woman hates or is undecided about you … dating will not change her mind (her friends will see to it).
    And I’m pretty sure for most women their first boyfriends didn’t need to “date” them: “dating” is compensation for the woman not really liking the guy: the more a guy is spending on her … the less she thinks of him.
    And beware the woman coming out of a long relationship to “finally end up with a nice guy”: he will be expected to pay “relationship compensation” for all her previous bad relationships (despite their “superior relationship knowledge”, women always wind up “tricked” in relationships, yet they “just know” which guys are right for them when they are young … which changes as they get older?), settle for less than her full attention (because he was never her first choice) and face up to the very real possibility of being divorced and losing half his assets (the more partners a woman has, the less likely the marriage is to last) … if even more unlucky and she’s a single mother: if he’s seen as a father figure, he will have to pay for her child too.

    • umslopogaas says:

      Amen brother.

      Women have been feeding of man’s labour and provisions since time immemorial. Theirs has always been a parasitic existance, made possible only due to their sexual power and adeptness vis a vis manipulating your average man.

      One of the goals we should strive for, imo, is complete societal separation. Gender Apartheid. They’ve started it but only insofer as penalising males goes. They still want our cash. And I say…to hell with that.

      Men’s taxes should fund men’s issues and women’s taxes women’s issues. Heh. They would come crawling the very nice day, probably. Imagine women having to manage their own infrastructure, protect themselves, repair their stuff. I want to see that. It would be endlessly hilarious. And seeing as the Feminists have been bleating about the sameness of the sexes for the past 40 years…how can they now refuse, truly?

      I mean…women…if you truly *are* equal to men….why not actually *prove* it?

  5. Good God Man! Were you a fly on the wall my entire childhood? You have layed our perfectly the upbringing and indoctrination I received growing up as a latch key kid to an empowered single ‘mom.’ The only part that differs is that ritalin had not come into vogue when I went thru my wild stage.

    So what did I do when I grew up? I joined the Army and got married. As a child I was drawn to the Army because it had the appearance of manliness. Shooting crap, explosives, tanks, – an Army full of Men doing Manly stuff. Sad to say the Army is now the biggest group of white knight manginas you could imagine. Sensitivity training, family support groups, unqualified whorish female ‘soldiers.’ I have three deployments and by deployments I mean outside the wire deployments. At first the PTSD phenomina suprised me but now I realize the majority are due to changes in the Army itself. Instead of aggression and strength we get cultural awareness and post deployment mental health assessments.

    A failed marriage to a materialistic ‘happiness whore.’ Wasted years trying to ‘man up’ and protect the very thing that turned on me. Years spent learning the truths I should have been taught from the beginning. Years spent defending a country and civilization that only existed in my head. Now forced to Go My Own Way. Not because I want to, but because thats the only way available.

    The Lost Boys are coming home to roost. Society was able to squeak by while the boys were being emasculated. But now the day has come when these broken children are being asked to hold up the pillars of society as our forefathers did. It is very unlikely they will be up to the task. I am suprisingly ambivalent about this. A part of me can’t wait to see the house of cards fall.

    I hope there is a special place in hell for those lazy men and spiteful women that are responsible for this.

  6. @umslopugaas
    “One of the goals we should strive for, imo, is complete societal separation. Gender Apartheid. They’ve started it but only insofer as penalising males goes. They still want our cash. And I say…to hell with that.”

    Never happen man. For much the same reason as we’re in the mess we’re in. Men are not cohesive unless required to be. Men are competitors. You will never have a unified male front because there will always be enough horny guys willing to throw other guys under the bus to hit the honey pot. And the more honey pots they get to hit the more men they’d throw under the bus. Given enough honey pots, there are men who would throw ALL other men under the bus.

    Just look at American Government. Full of men willing to buy female votes with other mens money.

    Unless there was a very strong check (ie fear of death involved), you could never enforce this apartheid. Women know this. Women often act in a unified front for at least as long as it’s in their best interest to do so. The only way to accomplish this would be to remove all female political power. Then the men could lay the smackdown on other guys that break ranks. Unfortunately this is starting to sound like a sharia system and there are still way too many white knights around to prevent that.

    • umslopogaas says:

      @mortarmanmike:

      Never happen man. For much the same reason as we’re in the mess we’re in. Men are not cohesive unless required to be. Men are competitors. You will never have a unified male front because there will always be enough horny guys willing to throw other guys under the bus to hit the honey pot. And the more honey pots they get to hit the more men they’d throw under the bus. Given enough honey pots, there are men who would throw ALL other men under the bus.

      Just look at American Government. Full of men willing to buy female votes with other mens money.

      Unless there was a very strong check (ie fear of death involved), you could never enforce this apartheid. Women know this. Women often act in a unified front for at least as long as it’s in their best interest to do so. The only way to accomplish this would be to remove all female political power. Then the men could lay the smackdown on other guys that break ranks. Unfortunately this is starting to sound like a sharia system and there are still way too many white knights around to prevent that.”

      Well, yes and no. On the one hand you are correct. Pussy is one of the strongest urges we possess. Our sex drive is our ‘Achilles Heal’, the means by which women have – since time immemorial – divided us, manipulated us, ruled us. So yes…as long as we are slaves to our baser instincts and have no alternative this dynamic will continue.

      That said, I believe there are several wildcards/game changers just around the corner. As ‘The Fifth Horseman’ writes in his excellent article ‘The Misandry Bubble’ technological innovations such as cybersex and sexbots combined with artificial wombs and male contraceptives (which are also currently being researched)…will dramatically shift the balance of power in our favour. Thus they just might make a critical amount of men relatively speaking immune to women and their sexual power. Imo, these inventions will have a massive impact on the ‘Gender War’, similar in scope, imo, to the US entry into WWII (December 1941). At the very least, it will significantly increase by several orders of magnitude the amount of MGTOW. Thus sexual demand will nosedive, while supply will remain the same (or even increase if we have hard times and wimminz’ comfy government jobs vanish). And marriage vampire – females as well as their bloodsucking attorneys will all starve even sooner (due to next to noone marrying anymore), creating additional pressure on the ‘dearies’.

      You see…we live in interesting if cruel times, and the near future will be even more interesting. In a nutshell: this is 1943, eastern front. We are the Red Army of Men. It’s vicious, brutal, all out fighting. Casualities have been astronomical and still are high…yet time is on our side, and soon the initiative will be as well. We will have steadily increasing leverage and while many of us will fall…others will raise. Because we are so wholly decentralised we are invincible, imo. There is no central command to take out.

      We just need to play our cards right, once we’ve won the war. That phase will be critical. We need to create a robust system…able to contain women and their whimsical vices for as long as possible.

  7. umslopogaas says:

    @Mortarmanmike:

    Good God Man! Were you a fly on the wall my entire childhood? You have layed our perfectly the upbringing and indoctrination I received growing up as a latch key kid to an empowered single ‘mom.’ The only part that differs is that ritalin had not come into vogue when I went thru my wild stage.”

    Heh, not a fly exactly, no. Only we have all had so very similar experiences. So many of us went through the same kind of hell. I firmly believe…that those of us who can appreciate this article…are brothers in spirit. We are a many millions-strong army of angry ghosts.

    So what did I do when I grew up? I joined the Army and got married. As a child I was drawn to the Army because it had the appearance of manliness. Shooting crap, explosives, tanks, – an Army full of Men doing Manly stuff. Sad to say the Army is now the biggest group of white knight manginas you could imagine. Sensitivity training, family support groups, unqualified whorish female ‘soldiers.’ I have three deployments and by deployments I mean outside the wire deployments. At first the PTSD phenomina suprised me but now I realize the majority are due to changes in the Army itself. Instead of aggression and strength we get cultural awareness and post deployment mental health assessments.”

    Good point. I think it is exactly because we were fed this incessant whimpy-ass touchy feely “sensitive” crap that so much of us craved for something marked, pronounced…maskuline. Personally, I never joined the army but I certainly share the feeling. It’s a row force within us. The will to fight and compete. Which is why…even when we’re 4 years old we like to play with toy soldiers, imagining battles…instead of fumbling with barbie dolls. This is also why we play videogames: it’s a respite, a reprieve where we can again be men, and live out our most primal urges.

    A failed marriage to a materialistic ‘happiness whore.’ Wasted years trying to ‘man up’ and protect the very thing that turned on me. Years spent learning the truths I should have been taught from the beginning. Years spent defending a country and civilization that only existed in my head. Now forced to Go My Own Way. Not because I want to, but because thats the only way available.”

    Amen, brother. And my condolences. It’s a hard business when you do your part, fight for your land…only to get viciously knifed in the back…by those that supposedly *love* you. It’s deeply disillusioning. After that going your own way is the only option left, to a man with brains. Because offering yourself up for slaughter yet again…is just plain out masochism. And thus the West will burn for its sins, its ‘fire fighters’ having quietly slipped away…one man at a time.

    The Lost Boys are coming home to roost. Society was able to squeak by while the boys were being emasculated. But now the day has come when these broken children are being asked to hold up the pillars of society as our forefathers did. It is very unlikely they will be up to the task. I am suprisingly ambivalent about this. A part of me can’t wait to see the house of cards fall.

    I hope there is a special place in hell for those lazy men and spiteful women that are responsible for this.”

    That’s the gist of it. In an abstract sense, to any patriot, it is painful to watch as your country goes to shambles. However, when our women tore up the social contract, destroyed the family, murdered love…and created in its stead a cold society of sexual darwinism and combat dating…they also removed any lingering duty you or I might have to fight for and protect…our country.

    We can go our own way, relax and watch it all go up in flames. Or not. It will chiefly depend on the wimminz coming to their senses before it all collapses. Will they do so? Who knows. I’m not keeping my fingers crossed.

    Oh, and rest assured…there will be justice yet. These women – who so haughtily waltzed around in their prime years and so cruelly played with and discarded men – will suffer yet. Their time will come. When their beauty fades and their SMV collapses, when they raise cats alone and miserable, when there is noone to feed them, protect them, care for them…it is then that they will understand their abominable follies. That is if they can ever defeat their hamster.

  8. Love it.

    Personally, I get super tired of Susan real fast. Her comment threads are a blast to participate in though. Rarely do you get any female opinions of worth, but its good to see how the female mind works in real discussions and ideas where they at least have the ability to try and be honest (whether they’re still lying to themselves is another matter).

    I doubt women will turn this bus around quickly enough. The men involved are already burning out quickly (late 20’s, early 30’s). But women can still carousel ride until their mid 30’s. Even then it takes them awhile to realize exactly WHAT went wrong – if they can at all with their hamsters working overtime. So, at best, there will be an extra 10 years of men that are just fucking tired of it while women don’t have a clue.

    Get ready to jump into the water and swim overseas men. Pick a culture, learn its language, make sure your profession will be marketable.

    • umslopogaas says:

      @Leap:

      Hear, hear.

      I wholly understand where you’re coming from here. I too mostly read HUS for the female comments. It’s just part of me that does not want to believe that there is no hope, that women are not salvageable, that reform is impossible.

      Heh, and right again. I’m also quite skeptical about women’s ability to reform soon enough. Imo, there is a shit storm of massive proportinos brewing…and when it hits…as in…when Western societies go bust there will be a reckoning of biblical proportions. See, women are *not* independent. They are still – for the most part – fully dependant on us men for security, protection and upkeep.

      The wellfare state has simply given them the illusion of independence. Once *it* comes crashing down…so will the “empowerment” and “grrrrrl power” of 90% of all women. It will go fast, like a deflating balloon.

      ‘The Fifth Horseman’ has covered this in his article “The Misandry Bubble”.

      • Yeah.

        I wish Susan and Co. would be less antagonized by people looking to other cultures or moving overseas. I get not wanting to advertise that those cultures are far more appealing for wife material – gotta keep the men here. But, if they honestly wanted to solve the problem, they could look at which countries men were moving to in order to find a wife. Then take and see what could be done about emulating those cultures in their actions, values, and beliefs. Make yourself a reason your future husband would want to stay in the US.

        I don’t know the fifth horseman. I’ll see if I can track down that article

        [Umslopogaas: Indeed. If Susan was more rational she would not fight this battle seeing as she cannot win. But she – just like millions of other western women – does not want to have to compete with high quality women from outside the West. Thus she tries to suppress, to shut down such debate. It will of course prove impossible…but that doesn’t stop her from engaging in folly.

        Oh and go ahead. I can *very strongly* recommend “the Misandry Bubble”. It is one of the very best, outstanding analyses I’ve read on the internet. Therein ‘The Fifth Horseman’ offers a comprehensive analysis and predicts the misandry bubble will pop by 2020 due to a myriad of factors (explained in the article). It’s easily accessible…via google.]

  9. BeijaFlor says:

    I’ve been wont to say that I spent the Sexual Revolution interned as an enemy alien.

    I was raised by a single mother who worked for a living. I didn’t have access to a car through high school, which dealt me out of the dating market. Went on to seminary instead of college, learned how to suppress and “rise above” my sexual urges, then left there because I “didn’t have The Call.” Then my mom and I got kicked out of her sister’s house (where we’d been living all my life), and I got a job to pay our rent at the apartment we managed to get. Think what that did for my dating potential.

    Mom and I stayed together until she passed away. By then I was 48, alone in the townhouse I’d bought to share with her. I was also completely used to not having a girlfriend or a lover in my life … and quite able to take care of myself, thank you. (My life wasn’t completely “without romance;” I had four months-long affairs during my younger years, but none of ’em ever moved in and every one of ’em moved on when I didn’t move out. In retrospect, I’m thankful.)

    Now, ten years later, I’m still single. I’ve done some traveling, I have a nice (if modest) cruising sailboat out on The Chesapeake Bay, and I’m making my slow-but-sure preparations to “sail beyond the sunset.” I’m alone, but not lonely. And life is good.

    • umslopogaas says:

      @BeijaFlor:

      Well, life truly has not treated you kindly. I am very sorry about what you had to endure in your youth. At the same time I am happy you are doing the logical thing and getting the hell out.

      You are going your own way…and I salute you and wish you godspeed.

  10. […] Missing In Action: The Lost Boys Of The Sexual Revolution, from Umslopogaas (10 Jan 2012), touched my heart. The “Sexual Revolution” years, roughly 1965-1975, were the years of my adolescence and young manhood; and for many a young man, it was our sexual Vietnam. (I count myself lucky, as many of my contemporaries went to the real Vietnam. A few of my friends and acquaintances left bits of themselves there. A couple came back in body-bags.) […]

  11. […] Of the great many miseries and suffering Feminism has brought the West nothing, imo, can compare to the systematic psychological neutering of men and demonisation of masculinity itself. Not just because of the cruel, fascistic inhumanity of fiddling with and ‘engineering’ an entire sex but, more importantly, because of its diastrous consequences. Whereas since time immemorial men had had a clearcut set of ethics, behaviors and morals they could follow, they now had nothing, no compass, no direction. Their consciousness brainwashed and literally blankslated by massive educational and societal conditioning, they opted for the (seemingly) logical thing and desperately attempted to conform to Feminism’s comandments of “equality“, “respecting women” “male” “touchy-feely empathy“, domestication ”pacifism/passivism“…and all the other hogwash. In short…the Nice Guy was born. No strike that. The Nice Guy was systematically engineered, molded and crushed into being by Feminism. https://umslopogaas.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/missing-in-action-the-lost-boys-of-the-sexual-revolution… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s